Website 0.5.3.0 · Gateway 0.5.1.1
MISSION CONTROL · PUBLIC BETA v0.4
Know what works. Test what matters.
Mission Control turns a complicated idea into four simple actions: check the system, test something, verify evidence, or open the Library.
Check status
See what is alive, what is still a pilot, and what is not established.
View status ↓ 2Test something
Turn a claim, agent, workflow, or dataset into a small test brief.
Start a test ↓ 3Verify evidence
Use the Testing Ground for bounded evaluation and inspectable results.
Open Testing Ground → 4Open the Library
Find sources, provenance, rights, and evidence without pretending discovery equals proof.
Open Great Library →START A TEST
Five simple steps. One clean test brief.
This builder runs in your browser. It does not submit anything automatically. Do not enter classified, confidential, regulated, private, or security-sensitive information.
1 · TYPE
2 · QUESTION
3 · EXPECT
4 · FAIL
5 · BRIEF
CURRENT PUBLIC STATE
Simple enough to scan in ten seconds.
These are public operational states, not marketing claims and not a substitute for canonical scientific evidence.
Only canonical AA/BUBi evidence may change this state.
Bounded evaluation. No production probing by default.
Provenance-first repository search. Discovery is not validation.
Boundary: Mission Control is public and read-only. It cannot access private custody material, answer keys, credentials, unreleased security work, private participant data, or AA/BUBi scientific write authority.
Professional / Government evaluator view
EVALUATION FLOW
01Objective
What decision are we trying to support?
02Scope
What system, task, data, authority, and constraints are in bounds?
03Test
Which predefined checks produce observable evidence?
04Evidence
What artifacts, sources, traces, versions, and receipts support the result?
05Decision
SUPPORTED, REFUTED, CONFLICTED, UNKNOWN, or another explicitly authorized bounded state.
AWS / cloud integration review checklist
For architecture-review conversations only. No AWS partnership, endorsement, or validation is implied.
Telemetry
Can an independent assurance layer consume OpenTelemetry / CloudWatch traces, spans, tool calls, session identifiers, and evaluation outputs without controlling the production agent?
Authority
Which AgentCore Identity / IAM signals best describe what the agent was actually permitted to do when a claim or action was produced?
Evaluation boundary
Where should independent verification sit relative to AgentCore Evaluations so generation, platform evaluation, and final evidence authority remain distinct?
Receipt format
What identifiers and exports would make a Mission Control evidence receipt easiest to integrate into enterprise and government workflows?
IARPA Solutions Marketplace
IARPA describes the Marketplace as a pathway for innovative companies, researchers, and technology providers to submit solutions for expert assessment and potential discovery by government users.
Official IARPA Marketplace →
NIST AI TEVV
NIST's current TEVV work emphasizes customized assessment objectives, testing, measurement, documented evidence, and evaluation of agentic systems.
Official NIST TEVV-Athlon →
AWS AgentCore Evaluations + Observability
AWS documents OpenTelemetry-compatible traces, CloudWatch observability, and agent evaluation workflows. Mission Control's research question is how to preserve an independent evidence boundary around that telemetry.
Official AWS AgentCore Evaluations →No endorsement implied: Alexandria is not representing IARPA or NIST, and this interface is not a government certification surface. The goal is to make bounded evaluation evidence easier to inspect.